AISC 360 — Flexural Members (Chapter F)

Beam design per AISC 360-16: plastic moment, LTB, FLB, Cb factor, and section classification

Chapter F of AISC 360-16 is the most detailed chapter in the specification, containing 12 sections (F2 through F13) covering every conceivable cross-section shape. The central challenge in beam design is lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) — the tendency of a beam's compression flange to buckle sideways and twist when the unbraced length exceeds certain limits. This guide covers the complete flexural design framework with two fully solved examples.

1. Plastic Moment — The Upper Bound

The maximum moment a cross section can develop is the plastic moment:

Mp=FyZxM_p = F_y \cdot Z_x

where ZxZ_x is the plastic section modulus — the first moment of area of each half of the cross section about the plastic neutral axis. For a compact, fully braced beam, the nominal flexural strength is simply Mn=MpM_n = M_p. No beam can exceed MpM_p regardless of how much bracing is provided; any LTB, FLB, or WLB check that computes Mn>MpM_n > M_p is capped at MpM_p.

LRFD: ϕbMn=0.90Mp=0.90FyZx\phi_b M_n = 0.90 \, M_p = 0.90 \, F_y \, Z_x

ASD: Mn/Ωb=Mp/1.67=FyZx/1.67M_n / \Omega_b = M_p / 1.67 = F_y \, Z_x / 1.67

2. Section Classification for Flexure (Table B4.1b)

Unlike compression (where elements are either "nonslender" or "slender"), flexural members have a three-tier classification that determines which limit states apply:

ClassCriterionBehavior
Compactλλp\lambda \leq \lambda_pFull plastic capacity (MpM_p). No local buckling before full plastification.
Noncompactλp<λλr\lambda_p < \lambda \leq \lambda_rPartial yielding. Capacity between MpM_p and 0.7FySx0.7 F_y S_x (linear interpolation).
Slenderλ>λr\lambda > \lambda_rElastic local buckling governs. Capacity below 0.7FySx0.7 F_y S_x.

Width-to-Thickness Limits

Elementλ\lambdaλp\lambda_p (compact)λr\lambda_r (noncompact)A992 values
Flange (I-shape)bf/(2tf)b_f/(2t_f)0.38E/Fy0.38\sqrt{E/F_y}1.0E/Fy1.0\sqrt{E/F_y}9.15 / 24.1
Web (I-shape, flexure)h/twh/t_w3.76E/Fy3.76\sqrt{E/F_y}5.70E/Fy5.70\sqrt{E/F_y}90.6 / 137.3
HSS flangeb/tb/t1.12E/Fy1.12\sqrt{E/F_y}1.40E/Fy1.40\sqrt{E/F_y}27.0 / 33.7
Round HSS / PipeD/tD/t0.07E/Fy0.07 E/F_y0.31E/Fy0.31 E/F_y40.6 / 179.8
Key fact: Nearly all standard W shapes in A992 (Fy=50F_y = 50 ksi) are compact for both flange and web. The exceptions are a handful of shapes like W21×48, W14×99 in high-strength steel, and some light W shapes. For A992, you can generally assume compact and verify with a quick b/t check.

3. Lateral-Torsional Buckling (LTB) — Section F2.2

LTB is the dominant limit state for beams. It occurs when the compression flange, acting like a column on an elastic foundation (the web), buckles laterally between brace points. The unbraced length LbL_b (distance between points of lateral support of the compression flange) determines the behavior zone:

3.1. Three Zones of Behavior

Zone 1: Full Plasticity (LbLpL_b \leq L_p)

Mn=Mp=FyZxM_n = M_p = F_y \cdot Z_x

The limiting unbraced length for full plastic capacity:

Lp=1.76ryEFyL_p = 1.76 \, r_y \sqrt{\frac{E}{F_y}}

For A992 steel: Lp=1.76ry29,000/50=42.4ryL_p = 1.76 \, r_y \sqrt{29{,}000/50} = 42.4 \, r_y (in inches).

Zone 2: Inelastic LTB (Lp<LbLrL_p < L_b \leq L_r)

Mn=Cb[Mp(Mp0.7FySx)(LbLpLrLp)]MpM_n = C_b \left[M_p - (M_p - 0.7 F_y S_x)\left(\frac{L_b - L_p}{L_r - L_p}\right)\right] \leq M_p

This is a linear interpolation between MpM_p (at Lb=LpL_b = L_p) and 0.7FySx0.7 F_y S_x (at Lb=LrL_b = L_r), multiplied by the moment gradient factor CbC_b. The limiting unbraced length for inelastic LTB:

Lr=1.95rtsE0.7FyJcSxho+(JcSxho)2+6.76(0.7FyE)2L_r = 1.95 \, r_{ts} \frac{E}{0.7 F_y} \sqrt{\frac{Jc}{S_x h_o} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{Jc}{S_x h_o}\right)^2 + 6.76 \left(\frac{0.7 F_y}{E}\right)^2}}

where rtsr_{ts} is the effective radius of gyration for LTB (tabulated in AISC Manual), JJ is the torsional constant, c=1.0c = 1.0 for doubly symmetric I-shapes, SxS_x is the elastic section modulus, and hoh_o is the distance between flange centroids.

Zone 3: Elastic LTB (Lb>LrL_b > L_r)

Mn=FcrSxMpM_n = F_{cr} \cdot S_x \leq M_p

where the elastic critical stress is:

Fcr=Cbπ2E(Lbrts)21+0.078JcSxho(Lbrts)2F_{cr} = \frac{C_b \pi^2 E}{\left(\dfrac{L_b}{r_{ts}}\right)^2} \sqrt{1 + 0.078 \frac{Jc}{S_x h_o} \left(\frac{L_b}{r_{ts}}\right)^2}

4. Moment Gradient Factor Cb

The CbC_b factor accounts for the fact that LTB is more critical under uniform moment than under moment gradient. A beam with end moments causing reverse curvature is much more stable than one with uniform moment:

Cb=12.5Mmax2.5Mmax+3MA+4MB+3MCRmC_b = \frac{12.5 \, M_{\max}}{2.5 \, M_{\max} + 3 M_A + 4 M_B + 3 M_C} \cdot R_m

where MmaxM_{\max} = absolute maximum moment in the unbraced segment, MA,MB,MCM_A, M_B, M_C = absolute moments at the quarter point, midpoint, and three-quarter point, respectively, and Rm=1.0R_m = 1.0 for doubly symmetric shapes.

Common Cb Values

Loading / Moment DiagramCb
Uniform moment (worst case)1.00
Simply supported, uniform load1.14
Simply supported, concentrated load at midspan1.32
Cantilever, concentrated load at free end1.00 (use 1.0 for cantilevers)
Equal and opposite end moments (reverse curvature)2.27
One end moment only (M at one end, 0 at other)1.67
Critical note: CbC_b can significantly increase the available moment. A beam that fails with Cb=1.0C_b = 1.0 may be adequate with the actual CbC_b. Always compute the actual CbC_b — using 1.0 is conservative but wasteful. However, MnM_n is always capped at MpM_p regardless of how large CbC_b is.

5. Flange Local Buckling (FLB) — Section F3

FLB is checked only for noncompact or slender flanges. For compact flanges (all standard W shapes in A992), FLB does not govern.

Noncompact Flanges

Mn=Mp(Mp0.7FySx)(λλpfλrfλpf)M_n = M_p - (M_p - 0.7 F_y S_x) \left(\frac{\lambda - \lambda_{pf}}{\lambda_{rf} - \lambda_{pf}}\right)

Slender Flanges

Mn=0.9EkcSxλ2M_n = \frac{0.9 E k_c S_x}{\lambda^2}

where kc=4/h/twk_c = 4/\sqrt{h/t_w} and 0.35kc0.760.35 \leq k_c \leq 0.76.

6. Other Cross-Section Types (F4–F13)

Chapter F provides specific provisions for every shape type. The applicable section is determined by the cross-section geometry:

SectionCross SectionKey Difference from F2
F2Doubly symmetric compact I-shapesPrimary section — LTB and yielding only
F3Doubly symmetric I-shapes with noncompact/slender flangesAdds FLB check
F4Other I-shapes with compact/noncompact websSingly symmetric, uses RpcR_{pc} and RptR_{pt}
F5Doubly symmetric I-shapes with slender websPlate girders, RpgR_{pg} factor
F6I-shapes bent about minor axisNo LTB — only yielding and FLB
F7Square and rectangular HSSYielding + FLB + WLB (no LTB for closed sections)
F8Round HSS and PipesYielding + local buckling based on D/t
F9Tees and double anglesLTB with stem in compression, MnM_n reduced
F10Single anglesYielding + LTB about geometric axis, with MyM_y = 1.5 My for unequal legs
F11Rectangular bars and roundsLTB and yielding, Mp=FyZ1.6FySM_p = F_y Z \leq 1.6 F_y S
F12Unsymmetric shapesGeneral yielding and LTB provisions
F13Proportioning limitsh/tw260h/t_w \leq 260, Iyc/Iy0.1I_{yc}/I_y \geq 0.1

Solved Example 1 — W14×22 Simply Supported Beam

Given: W14×22 (W360×32.9), A992 steel (Fy=50F_y = 50 ksi), simply supported span L=20L = 20 ft (6.10 m), uniform load, lateral bracing at supports and midspan (Lb=10L_b = 10 ft = 120 in).

Properties: Zx=33.2Z_x = 33.2 in³, Sx=29.0S_x = 29.0 in³, ry=1.04r_y = 1.04 in, rts=1.22r_{ts} = 1.22 in, J=0.208J = 0.208 in&sup4;, ho=13.7h_o = 13.7 in, bf=5.00b_f = 5.00 in, tf=0.335t_f = 0.335 in, c=1.0c = 1.0.

Step 1 — Section Classification

Flange: bf/(2tf)=5.00/(2×0.335)=7.46λpf=9.15b_f/(2t_f) = 5.00/(2 \times 0.335) = 7.46 \leq \lambda_{pf} = 9.15 → compact ✓

Web: h/tw=53.3λpw=90.6h/t_w = 53.3 \leq \lambda_{pw} = 90.6 → compact ✓

Section is compact → use Section F2 (yielding + LTB only, no FLB).

Step 2 — Plastic Moment

Mp=FyZx=50×33.2=1,660 in⋅kips=138.3 ft⋅kipsM_p = F_y \cdot Z_x = 50 \times 33.2 = 1{,}660 \text{ in·kips} = 138.3 \text{ ft·kips}

Step 3 — Limiting Unbraced Lengths

Lp=1.76×1.04×29,00050=1.76×1.04×24.08=44.1 in=3.67 ftL_p = 1.76 \times 1.04 \times \sqrt{\frac{29{,}000}{50}} = 1.76 \times 1.04 \times 24.08 = 44.1 \text{ in} = 3.67 \text{ ft}
Lr=1.95×1.22×29,000350.208×1.029.0×13.7+(0.20829.0×13.7)2+6.76(3529,000)2L_r = 1.95 \times 1.22 \times \frac{29{,}000}{35} \sqrt{\frac{0.208 \times 1.0}{29.0 \times 13.7} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{0.208}{29.0 \times 13.7}\right)^2 + 6.76\left(\frac{35}{29{,}000}\right)^2}}

Computing the terms: Jc/(Sxho)=0.208/(29.0×13.7)=5.23×104Jc/(S_x h_o) = 0.208/(29.0 \times 13.7) = 5.23 \times 10^{-4}

(0.7Fy/E)2=(35/29,000)2=1.457×106(0.7F_y/E)^2 = (35/29{,}000)^2 = 1.457 \times 10^{-6}

Inner sqrt: (5.23×104)2+6.76×1.457×106=2.74×107+9.85×106=3.18×103\sqrt{(5.23 \times 10^{-4})^2 + 6.76 \times 1.457 \times 10^{-6}} = \sqrt{2.74 \times 10^{-7} + 9.85 \times 10^{-6}} = 3.18 \times 10^{-3}

Outer sqrt: 5.23×104+3.18×103=3.70×103=0.0608\sqrt{5.23 \times 10^{-4} + 3.18 \times 10^{-3}} = \sqrt{3.70 \times 10^{-3}} = 0.0608

Lr=1.95×1.22×828.6×0.0608=119.8 in=9.98 ftL_r = 1.95 \times 1.22 \times 828.6 \times 0.0608 = 119.8 \text{ in} = 9.98 \text{ ft}

Step 4 — Determine LTB Zone

Lb=10L_b = 10 ft = 120 in. Since Lr=9.98L_r = 9.98 ft and Lb=10.0>LrL_b = 10.0 > L_r, the beam is just barely in Zone 3 (elastic LTB).

Step 5 — Cb Factor

For a simply supported beam with uniform load, braced at midspan, the critical unbraced segment is one half of the span. The moment diagram in each half is a parabola. Using quarter-point moments in the segment:

Cb=12.5×Mmax2.5Mmax+3MA+4MB+3MCC_b = \frac{12.5 \times M_{\max}}{2.5 M_{\max} + 3 M_A + 4 M_B + 3 M_C}

For the half-span segment with maximum moment at the midspan brace point:Cb=1.30 C_b = 1.30 (from AISC Manual Table 3-1 or calculated from quarter-point moments).

Step 6 — Nominal Flexural Strength (LRFD)

Since Lb>LrL_b > L_r, use elastic LTB (F2-4):

Fcr=1.30×π2×29,000(120/1.22)21+0.078×0.20829.0×13.7×(120/1.22)2F_{cr} = \frac{1.30 \times \pi^2 \times 29{,}000}{(120/1.22)^2} \sqrt{1 + 0.078 \times \frac{0.208}{29.0 \times 13.7} \times (120/1.22)^2}

(Lb/rts)2=(120/1.22)2=9,672(L_b/r_{ts})^2 = (120/1.22)^2 = 9{,}672

0.078×5.23×104×9,672=0.3940.078 \times 5.23 \times 10^{-4} \times 9{,}672 = 0.394

Fcr=1.30×286,2169,6721+0.394=38.47×1.181=45.4 ksiF_{cr} = \frac{1.30 \times 286{,}216}{9{,}672} \sqrt{1 + 0.394} = 38.47 \times 1.181 = 45.4 \text{ ksi}
Mn=FcrSx=45.4×29.0=1,317 in⋅kips=109.8 ft⋅kipsM_n = F_{cr} \cdot S_x = 45.4 \times 29.0 = 1{,}317 \text{ in·kips} = 109.8 \text{ ft·kips}

Check: Mn=109.8Mp=138.3M_n = 109.8 \leq M_p = 138.3 → OK, cap not reached

ϕbMn=0.90×109.8=98.8 ft⋅kips\phi_b M_n = 0.90 \times 109.8 = 98.8 \text{ ft·kips}
Impact of Lb: With Lb=10L_b = 10 ft, ϕbMn=98.8\phi_b M_n = 98.8 ft·kips (71% of ϕbMp\phi_b M_p). If the beam were fully braced (LbLp=3.67L_b \leq L_p = 3.67 ft), ϕbMn=124.5\phi_b M_n = 124.5 ft·kips — a 26% increase. This illustrates the dramatic impact of inadequate lateral bracing. Adding one more brace point (Lb = 6.67 ft) would put the beam in the inelastic zone and recover most of the capacity.
Verify automatically in CalcSteel — Open the editor with AISC 360 →

Solved Example 2 — W21×44, Concentrated Load

Given: W21×44 (W530×65.6), A992, span 24 ft (7.32 m), concentrated load at midspan, lateral bracing at supports and load point (Lb=12L_b = 12 ft = 144 in). Find ϕbMn\phi_b M_n.

Properties: Zx=95.4Z_x = 95.4 in³, Sx=81.6S_x = 81.6 in³, ry=1.26r_y = 1.26 in, rts=1.48r_{ts} = 1.48 in, J=0.843J = 0.843 in&sup4;, ho=20.7h_o = 20.7 in.

Step 1 — Lp and Lr

Lp=1.76×1.26×24.08=53.4 in=4.45 ftL_p = 1.76 \times 1.26 \times 24.08 = 53.4 \text{ in} = 4.45 \text{ ft}

LrL_r (from AISC Manual Table 3-2 or computed): approximately 12.5 ft (150 in).

Since Lb=12.0L_b = 12.0 ft and Lp=4.45<Lb=12.0<Lr=12.5L_p = 4.45 < L_b = 12.0 < L_r = 12.5, the beam is in Zone 2 (inelastic LTB).

Step 2 — Cb for Concentrated Load at Midspan

With a point load at midspan and bracing at midspan, each half-span has a linear moment diagram going from MmaxM_{\max} at midspan to 0 at the support. For this triangle diagram:

Cb=12.5×1.02.5(1.0)+3(0.75)+4(0.50)+3(0.25)=12.57.0=1.79C_b = \frac{12.5 \times 1.0}{2.5(1.0) + 3(0.75) + 4(0.50) + 3(0.25)} = \frac{12.5}{7.0} = 1.79

(Using normalized moments: Mmax = 1.0, MA = 0.75, MB = 0.50, MC = 0.25.) However, the AISC Manual lists Cb=1.67C_b = 1.67 for this case per the full formula with Rm. We'll use Cb=1.67C_b = 1.67.

Step 3 — Inelastic LTB

Mp=50×95.4=4,770 in⋅kips=397.5 ft⋅kipsM_p = 50 \times 95.4 = 4{,}770 \text{ in·kips} = 397.5 \text{ ft·kips}
0.7FySx=35×81.6=2,856 in⋅kips=238.0 ft⋅kips0.7 F_y S_x = 35 \times 81.6 = 2{,}856 \text{ in·kips} = 238.0 \text{ ft·kips}
Mn=1.67[397.5(397.5238.0)(12.04.4512.54.45)]M_n = 1.67 \left[397.5 - (397.5 - 238.0)\left(\frac{12.0 - 4.45}{12.5 - 4.45}\right)\right]
=1.67[397.5159.5×0.938]=1.67×[397.5149.6]= 1.67 \left[397.5 - 159.5 \times 0.938\right] = 1.67 \times [397.5 - 149.6]
=1.67×247.9=414.0 ft⋅kips= 1.67 \times 247.9 = 414.0 \text{ ft·kips}

Check cap: Mn=414.0>Mp=397.5M_n = 414.0 > M_p = 397.5 → use Mn=Mp=397.5M_n = M_p = 397.5 ft·kips

ϕbMn=0.90×397.5=357.8 ft⋅kips\phi_b M_n = 0.90 \times 397.5 = 357.8 \text{ ft·kips}
Cb impact: Without the Cb factor (Cb=1.0C_b = 1.0), the inelastic LTB capacity would be Mn=247.9M_n = 247.9 ft·kips (62% of MpM_p). WithCb=1.67 C_b = 1.67, the Mn exceeds Mp and is capped at full plastic capacity. The Cb factor alone recovered 150 ft·kips of capacity — this is why computing the actual Cb is essential for economical beam design.
Verify automatically in CalcSteel — Open the editor with AISC 360 →

7. International Comparison — Flexure

AspectAISC 360Eurocode 3NBR 8800
LTB approachThree zones (Lp, Lr), Cb factorχLT reduction factor + C1Three zones + Cb (= AISC)
Moment gradientCb (quarter-point formula)C1 (different formula, similar values)Cb (= AISC formula)
Section classificationCompact / Noncompact / SlenderClass 1, 2, 3, 4Compact / Noncompact / Slender (= AISC)
Plastic momentMp=FyZxM_p = F_y Z_xMpl=fyWplM_{pl} = f_y W_{pl} (Class 1/2)Mpl=fyZxM_{pl} = f_y Z_x
φ for flexure0.901/γM1 = 1.001/γa1 ≈ 0.91
The AISC Cb formula and the Eurocode C1 factor produce similar numerical values for common loading patterns. The three-zone approach (AISC/NBR) is more intuitive; the χLT reduction factor approach (EC3) is more algebraically compact but requires looking up imperfection factors. CalcSteel implements all three standards and shows side-by-side comparison in the verification report.
Open the editor with AISC 360 →